Wednesday June 23, 2010 at 0:20

Gabe makes a good point. I’ve already had more awkward boners in the first two episodes of this season than I’d care to psychoanalyze. True Blood is totally Twilight for The Gays.

Gabe makes a good point. I’ve already had more awkward boners in the first two episodes of this season than I’d care to psychoanalyze. True Blood is totally Twilight for The Gays.

Wednesday June 23, 2010 at 0:00

Jake: Who’s winning the World Cup? Is it Chile? Chillayyyyyyyy.Victor: Nobody is, silly.Jake: Do you mean in a figurative sense, because everyone participating in the World Cup is a loser? Or because there isn’t a distinct winner until the finals are over?Victor: Because they’re still qualifying for the final sixteen.Jake: Christ, basketball is so confusing.

Jake: Who’s winning the World Cup? Is it Chile? Chillayyyyyyyy.
Victor: Nobody is, silly.
Jake: Do you mean in a figurative sense, because everyone participating in the World Cup is a loser? Or because there isn’t a distinct winner until the finals are over?
Victor: Because they’re still qualifying for the final sixteen.
Jake: Christ, basketball is so confusing.

Tuesday June 22, 2010 at 23:00

lostincoffeerings:

River reminded me of Princess Leia this episode.

Interesting observation. Toby Haynes, the director of the episode, stated in Confidential that he was deriving inspiration from the Indiana Jones series, and even used a piece of the score from Raiders of the Lost Ark as they were entering the Under Henge. Perhaps it wasn’t the only LucasFilm production the team was borrowing from.

lostincoffeerings:

River reminded me of Princess Leia this episode.

Interesting observation. Toby Haynes, the director of the episode, stated in Confidential that he was deriving inspiration from the Indiana Jones series, and even used a piece of the score from Raiders of the Lost Ark as they were entering the Under Henge. Perhaps it wasn’t the only LucasFilm production the team was borrowing from.

This post was reblogged from Lost in Coffee Rings.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 21:57

THINGS THAT CAN’T JUSTIFIABLY PRECEDE “AS HELL”

  • Cool
  • Lame
  • Sexy
  • Boring
  • Hungry
  • Tasty

etc.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 21:40

extrafirmhold:

planettampon:

If you’re in any way attracted to Rose Byrne, please watch this video. It’s for some bullshit Russell Brand film in which Byrne plays a slutty popstar, Jackie Q. This is the film clip for her song ‘Ring Round My Rosie’.

There are no double entendres in this video; Rose Byrne doesn’t hold back begging you to lick her asshole. I’ve never wanted to be so straight in all my life.

Can I fucking download this song somewhere???? PERFECTION. I watched the first 5 minutes of this film - and I would see it just to see her character alone. Also - rimming FTW!

Eh. It looks like this ties into the extremism pop music is portrayed as in the film (see: that Aldous Snow music video where he talks about how much he just loves drugs), but it made me laugh less than some eulogies.

People are so shocked when I tell them I’m not bothered to see Get Him To The Greek, for obvious reasons. It just looks horrendously unfunny. It could be because I’m so tired of Russell Brand, whose persona was created around idiosyncrasies which no longer exist (drug and alcohol addiction, womanizing), idiosyncrasies he relied upon for his comedy. What’s he going to talk about on stage now? How fun it is to fuck Katy Perry? Now that he can’t rely on lasciviousness, will he simply retire to reminding us he was on drugs once? The anecdotes that made him so successful are about wanton recklessness, a revival of the rock and roll spirit of his idols, but now that he’s an established actor with significantly more to lose, he can’t afford to take other people’s money and make random shit, the sort of anarchic creativity that put him where he is.

Forgetting Sarah Marshall continues to be one of my favourite films, but the reason it worked was because it had heart. If I wanted to watch a superstar kissing loads of beautiful women while spending a ridiculous amount of money, I’ll watch Entourage. I don’t know, man, I think for someone like me, who’s devoured weeks’ worth of content, sufficient to know about as much about a person as you can without knowing them personally, Get Him To The Greek holds nothing.

EDIT: Here’s the video. Christ, Russ, Matt was right. Not that good, and you can tell you’re trying your hardest.

This post was reblogged from Extra firm hold.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 19:18

“Pun” rhymes with “fun”.

“Pun” rhymes with “fun”.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 17:01

“Somehow that seems wrong.”

Abby. Yes! I’m certain it means something, but I can’t possibly think what. Also note that the specific date the nurse’s tag was issued was “30/11/1990”. 11:30 has been included a couple times throughout the series, further suggesting some kind of significance. Christ, this is what happens when there’s no LOST to nitpick.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 16:36

Rory has been a nurse for twenty years.

Rory has been a nurse for twenty years.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 15:14

Alright, yes, I’m officially on board with this ridiculous Jacket!Doctor theory. The Angels just stole his jacket and now he’s wearing one, after re-appearing suddenly moments after leaving, talking about how she needs to start trusting him and that she needs to remember what he told her when she was seven.

Alright, yes, I’m officially on board with this ridiculous Jacket!Doctor theory. The Angels just stole his jacket and now he’s wearing one, after re-appearing suddenly moments after leaving, talking about how she needs to start trusting him and that she needs to remember what he told her when she was seven.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 15:04

Amelia looking up after hearing the TARDIS returning in “The Eleventh Hour”. I quite like this Jacket!Doctor theory, and the finale is supposed to be all about little Amelia, so I’ve decided this is almost definitely a clue.

Amelia looking up after hearing the TARDIS returning in “The Eleventh Hour”. I quite like this Jacket!Doctor theory, and the finale is supposed to be all about little Amelia, so I’ve decided this is almost definitely a clue.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 14:09

“Man. Ok, so where should I start if I want to get on the Doctor Who train?”

Chrissy, my man, I’m glad you asked. I’m going to be drawn and quartered for this, but I think you could start at the first episode of this series, the fifth. It makes very few references to the immediately preceding series and is more accessible than before, I think. That’s really if you want to get into the game immediately. If you have some more patience, just start with the first episode of the Christopher Eccleston series, referred to as Series One, but actually the twenty-eighth. I kind of hated Christopher Eccleston’s Doctor and his companion, which is why I’m hesitant to start you there (I think it’ll put you off. It’s the least accessible series of the revival), but if you can endure that, the reward that is Tennant’s tenth Doctor is enough of a pay-off.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 13:43

Duck, Pond.

Duck, Pond.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 8:05

“Spoilers.”

“Spoilers.”

Monday June 21, 2010 at 5:00

A new, younger Doctor portrayed by a relatively new actor. A different crew and a different showrunner. A brand new companion. A hundred thousand naysayers proven wrong beyond a doubt by this brilliant, wonderful, incredible episode. I can’t wait until next week.

A new, younger Doctor portrayed by a relatively new actor. A different crew and a different showrunner. A brand new companion. A hundred thousand naysayers proven wrong beyond a doubt by this brilliant, wonderful, incredible episode. I can’t wait until next week.

Monday June 21, 2010 at 3:41

One of the few things I hate about Reddit (other than the unparalleled smugness of /r/atheism) are these stupid fucking questions that ask a broad group for the specific definition of a broad word. I saw someone ask something like “What’s the gay stance on Wicked?” once. Golly, I’m glad you asked so they can bring it up at the next gay congregation. Questions like “Ladies of Reddit: What do you look for in a guy?” are also ridiculous. Instead of trying to boil it down to a median, how about you just fucking ask the girl you’re trying to bang what she’s interested in?

One of the few things I hate about Reddit (other than the unparalleled smugness of /r/atheism) are these stupid fucking questions that ask a broad group for the specific definition of a broad word. I saw someone ask something like “What’s the gay stance on Wicked?” once. Golly, I’m glad you asked so they can bring it up at the next gay congregation. Questions like “Ladies of Reddit: What do you look for in a guy?” are also ridiculous. Instead of trying to boil it down to a median, how about you just fucking ask the girl you’re trying to bang what she’s interested in?

Page 7 of 321